| Welcome to the Sprawl Busters Newsflash Blog ~ established 1998 |
|
recent news List articles |
2003-05-10 A state environmental board in Maine has refused to allow a Wal-Mart developer to withdraw its palns for a supercenter, and residents in Bangor, Maine have thus blown a Wal-Mart supercenter out to sea. Here's the report from local activists: "In a tremendous victory for BACORD and for co-intervenor Maine Audubon Society, the Maine Board of Environmental Protection voted 6-2 on May 8th to reject an attempt by Widewaters, a New York-based developer, to withdraw their Wal-Mart superstore site application just before a scheduled final vote on the BEP's denial order. This precedent-setting vote was then followed by a 5-3 vote ratifying and approving the BEP denial order which outlines the history of the project, articulates its major issues, and explains the detailed reasons for the BEP's denial of the proposed Wal-Mart superstore project, located near the Penjajawoc Marsh in Bangor. The board had earlier voted (5-3) on March 20, 2003, to deny the project, and had directed the BEP staff to draft a denial order.Widewaters sent a letter earlier this week to the BEP announcing that it was withdrawing its application. This was a clear and stunning attempt to circumvent the BEP's decision-making processes, and to avoid having formal criteria established regarding development near natural resource wildlife areas and near the Penjajawoc Marsh in particular. Widewaters also apparently hoped to resubmit the application to the newly constituted BEP within a few weeks, in hopes of getting a decision more favorable to their project. Assistant Attorney General Peggy McCloskey advised the Board that they did have the necessary discretion and authority to reject a withdrawal attempt under the circumstances. Given that both intervenors (BACORD and Maine Audubon) were opposing the withdrawal, and given that months of public hearings and testimony had already taken place, the Board agreed that they should vote on the denial order and that Widewaters could not short-circuit the process of final determination by a last-minute withdrawal. Since there have been no specific rules in place addressing this issue, the Maine Attorney General's office advised that a comparable legal case in Vermont could be used as a basis of legal guidance. The Board's vote to assert their own control over their decision making processes was hence setting an important precedent in Maine. What you can do: BACORD will be exploring next steps over the next few weeks and months, as we |
|
|
info@sprawl-busters.com |
Voter Campaigns 21 Grinnell St, Greenfield ~ MA 01301 (413) 772-6289 |