Sprawl-Busters Newsflash Blog - Anti-Sprawl news since 1998.
Subscribe to Sprawl-Busters Blog Follow Sprawl Busters on Twitter
Occupy Walmart & Order Al's Books Movies Newsflash! The Case Against Sprawl Home Towns Not Home Depot Victories Your Battles About Us Contact Us  

recent news

List articles
by the month:

2017
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2016
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2015
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2014
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2013
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2012
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2011
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2010
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2009
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2008
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2007
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2006
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2005
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2004
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2003
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2002
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2001
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2000
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

1999
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

1998
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC


Search database by text:

1999-01-08
North Auburn, CA. Target's All Wet.

Target is getting soaked in controversy in North Auburn, CA. because of their plan to asphalt a wetlands. In 1996, citizens' groups in North Auburn sued Target and the Placer County Board of Supervisors when the latter voted to approve a conditional use permit to allow a 105,000 s.f. Target sprawl on 11 acres of land off Highway 49. Target's plan includes paving over wetlands in the northwest portion of their lot, so they can add an extra 35 to 40 parking spaces. But the Friends of Placer County pointed out that the County's General Plan land use policy stipulates that all new development must result in a "no net loss" of wetlands. The Plan goes on to say that the most "desirable" way to achieve "no net loss" of wetlands is to avoid building on them in the first place. The Supervisors, however, found it more "desirable" to allow destruction of the wetland and requiring Target to spend $371,000 to buy nearly 8 acres of land as a "wetlands mitigation land bank". Target also offered to spend another $50,000 for on-site drainage improvements. Lawyers for Target announced on January 5th. that the company was prepared to toss in another $100,000 for more drainage work in the area to help residents get over losing another real wetland. But the lawyer for the Friends of Placer County replied:"$100,000 won't mitigate this project." The Supervisors have asked the County Superior Court for a delay in their court case beyond the February 2nd deadline. The Court wants the County to show how the "no net loss" is being resolved by that time. Groups like the Sierra Club, the Friends, the Fiddler Green and Mountain Shadows homeowners association are convinced that the only "net loss" Target is worried about is financial. To add insult to injury, the Friends has been fighting off Wal-Mart, Home Depot, Target, and it was recently announced that the Border's Book chain store wants to locate here too -- and guess where they've decided to splash down? In a wetlands, of course. Another "net loss" for the community.

What you can do: For further details about the Placer County Follies, contact Dale Smith at 530-885-8487. And scroll down to the August 13 and July 30 newsflash entries for more on North Auburn battles.










 
 
"Norman has become the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement" ~ 60 Minutes

info@sprawl-busters.com
Strategic Planning ~ Field Operations
Voter Campaigns 
21 Grinnell St, Greenfield ~ MA 01301
(413) 772-6289