Sprawl-Busters Newsflash Blog - Anti-Sprawl news since 1998.
Subscribe to Sprawl-Busters Blog Follow Sprawl Busters on Twitter
Occupy Walmart & Order Al's Books Movies Newsflash! The Case Against Sprawl Home Towns Not Home Depot Victories Your Battles About Us Contact Us  

recent news

List articles
by the month:

2017
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2016
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2015
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2014
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2013
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2012
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2011
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2010
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2009
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2008
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2007
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2006
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2005
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2004
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2003
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2002
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2001
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2000
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

1999
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

1998
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC


Search database by text:

2008-05-14
Clearbrook, VA. Residents Celebrate Wal-Martís 61st Cancellation

It's been a great year for killing Wal-Marts. The retailer has cancelled another superstore project, bringing its total to 61 projects lost or delayed since last June. This time the collapse was in Clearbrook, Virginia. On February 3, 2007, Sprawl-Busters reported that a Tennessee developer was trying to build 204,000 s.f. Wal-Mart superstore across from the Clearbrook, Virginia Elementary School. But a group called Citizens for Smart Growth challenged HolRob Investments, the developer, and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. HolRob tried to have the citizen's lawsuit dismissed, but their motion was denied by the court, and the project went to a Circuit Court judge. The CSG group charged that the project's review process was collapsed into just six weeks, ending in a 4-1 vote by the County Board in October, 2006. The citizen's group wants the case remanded back to the County's Planning Commission, with a full traffic study to be done this time. The group retained Richmond, Virginia attorney Phillip Strother, who also served as the victorious lead counsel for citizens in Front Royal, Virginia before the Virginia Supreme Court. The residents pointed out that the land Wal-Mart wanted was intended for a "village concept" in the county's Overlay District guidelines. The Clearbrook Overlay District Concept calls for small commercial and retail development similar in feeling to a village street -- the antithesis of a Wal-Mart supercenter. "The first time the overlay is questioned the county rolls [over]," one CSG member complained. "Some folks have said we're doing away with the overlay," the County's Administrator said "But they're complying with the overlay" by seeking the special-use permit it allows," he added. "All of us hoped for more of a type of development" in style and size -- things like doctor's offices, sit-down restaurants and small office buildings. The county granted a special use permit to Wal-Mart that allowed them to completely ignore the 50,000 s.f. size cap suggested in the overlay zone -- and instead build 4 times larger. But the major issue is traffic, CSG said -- the fact that the state Department of Transportation never did a final traffic study. CSG also has produced its own rendering of what a "Clearbrook Old Towne Village" concept should look like, with "brown and stone exteriors...pitched green roofs... a kiosk [that guides] folks to Tanglewood and Valley View Malls...sidewalks that allow people to easily travel through the village...trees around the village buffer the development from the adjacent Blue Ridge Parkway." In approving a Wal-Mart supercenter, and throwing out the size cap, the county clearly pulled a bait 'n switch on local residents. In October, 2006, when Wal-Mart received County approval, the retailer predicted that work on the store would begin in the first quarter of 2007. That was never to be. Wal-Mart revealed that approval of the new supercenter would result in the closing of a smaller Wal-Mart discount store about a mile north of the supercenter site. The "old" Wal-Mart is 17 years old -- about the end of its lifespan for the retailer. Wal-Mart claims it is just leasing the existing store, and would have to negotiate with the landlord, yet city tax records, indicate the building is owned by "Wal-Mart Stores Inc." On April 28, 2007, the anti-Wal-Mart group contacted Sprawl-Busters with an update. "The circuit court ruled to dismiss our lawsuit. ALL the traffic now will use the one entrance/exit. Wal-Mart just assumed they could get a 2nd entrance at the upscale Landrover dealership, but they were told 'NO.' We, of course, were all told 60% of the traffic would never reach the nearby school. The traffic will include Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart family, school children, etc. Residents will share one traffic light. This is the only entrance and exit into Clearbrook Elementary School and the only way EMS can access Route 220. Route 220 is dangerous enough now and will only get more dangerous. The area is also slated for I-73, which means more profits for Wal-Mart and more crime for us when the interstate arrives." Judge Robert Doherty ruled that the county's decision to allow the construction met the legal standard of being "fairly debatable," that even if "objective and reasonable persons" had differing opinions about it, the board of supervisors' decision was reasonable and legal. The judge ruled that the traffic impact studies paid for by the developer were adequate and that the county review was not "arbitrary, capricious, irrational or unreasonable." The county said it was "pleased" with the court's ruling. But Citizens for Smart Growth Roanoke said the special-use permit violates the intent of a special Clearbrook Village Overlay District that the county adopted in 2000. "It is not the role of the Court to decide whether a Wal-Mart Supercenter should be built on the land in question," Judge Doherty wrote. The court's job "is to decide whether the Board, as the legislative body, complied with the law when it passed the ordinance that rezoned the land and granted the special-use permit." But this week, after more than a year and a half of opposition and court battles, Wal-Mart pulled the plug in Clearbrook. Roanoke County Administrator Elmer Hodge told the Roanoke Times that the project has been canceled. Opponents of the project couldn't believe their good fortune. "I'm as elated as they come," said Pamela Berberich, who brought the lawsuit against the project, and helped finance it. "Everybody told me that what I was doing was fruitless, but maybe my efforts came to pass after all."


What you can do: Wal-Mart did not return the newspaper's calls, but apparently letters are going out this week to some homeowners who had optioned their homes to HolRob. Now those options are worthless. Instead of going with a new supercenter, Wal-Mart renewed its "lease" on its existing store -- which the retailer appears to own anyway. "Whether they'll reconsider in the long range, we don't know," the County Administrator told the newspaper. Hodge pointed out that the big losers were the property owners who had contracts with HolRob. He said some "already had made other arrangements. It's very unfortunate for them." Meanwhile Clearbook now is unsure if certain road improvements needed to accommodate the Wal-Mart will ever get done. "We don't have the money and the state doesn't have the money" the Adminstrator admitted. "We don't know if we're back to ground zero, or if there might be another company willing to move in... it would be unfortunate if they are pulling out sooner than is necessary." Readers are urged to email Richard Flora, the Chairman of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at bos@RoanokeCountyVA.gov, with this message: "Now that Wal-Mart has left Clearbrook at the altar, its time for the county to tighten up the Clearbrook Overlay District to simply impose a 50,000 s.f. cap on retail building size, and eliminate the special permit provision, which was abused in this case. The intent of the Overlay zone was clearly to keep scale compatible with the character of the surrounding area. To prevent this kind of abuse from happening again, put a firm cap on size, and don't sell out homeowners to the highest commercial bidder. A number of landowners were hurt by this process, and the special permit loophole needs to be closed."











 
 
"Norman has become the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement" ~ 60 Minutes

info@sprawl-busters.com
Strategic Planning ~ Field Operations
Voter Campaigns 
21 Grinnell St, Greenfield ~ MA 01301
(413) 772-6289