Sprawl-Busters Newsflash Blog - Anti-Sprawl news since 1998.
Subscribe to Sprawl-Busters Blog Follow Sprawl Busters on Twitter
Occupy Walmart & Order Al's Books Movies Newsflash! The Case Against Sprawl Home Towns Not Home Depot Victories Your Battles About Us Contact Us  

recent news

List articles
by the month:

2017
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2016
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2015
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2014
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2013
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2012
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2011
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2010
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2009
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2008
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2007
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2006
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2005
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2004
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2003
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2002
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2001
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2000
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

1999
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

1998
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC


Search database by text:

2008-09-16
Lorain, OH. Wal-Mart Gets OK On the Rebound

On November 23, 2005, Sprawl-Busters reported that voters in Lorain, Ohio had rejected a Wal-Mart supercenter at the polls. When a Home Depot project followed almost immediately, a group called The Friends of Anna E. Martin, named in the memory of the land's former owner, formed to oppose Liberty Development Co.'s plans to build Lighthouse Village plaza on 65 acres. The group circulated petitions for a referendum against the rezoning. The Lorain City Council approved rezoning of the property by a vote of 9-2 in 2005, and approved the preliminary plans for the Lighthouse "Village" project. In a blatant attempt to attract political support among voters, the developer unveiled a list of potential tenants who would occupy this huge "Village", including Target, Olive Garden, Long Horn Steakhouse, Applebee's, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Starbucks and an International House of Pancakes. The developer also claimed (with unsubstantiated gross figures) that the project would create 950 jobs and generate $720,000 in annual real estate taxes. The Friends of Anna E. Martin said the landowner's intention was not to build a shopping center on her land. She willed the property to the Lorain YWCA in the 1960s to be preserved in its natural state and used for women's and youth programs. "All we're doing now is exercising our rights and taking this to the voters," the anti-Home Depot group said. "All we want is for the original deed restrictions to be followed in the will." A Probate Judge ruled in 1994 that the Church on the North Coast could buy the property from the YWCA and had to adhere to the conditions of the will. The Judge also ruled the church could sell the property to Liberty Development contingent on City Council approving the rezoning. Liberty Development was also required to donate $1.2 million to local charities to satisfy Martin's wishes in the will. The developer told the media, "We figured the residents were going to try to do something. There has been very little done with that land in the last 40 years, and there's going to be some people getting a lot of money from this (development) who need it." The developer ended up being the financial beneficiary of the deal, as a Home Depot was built at Lighthouse Village, along with a Kohl's Department store. On July 30, 2008, updated the story in Lorain, noting that the community was swirling with rumors that Wal-Mart was coming back for their second bite at the apple. Wal-Mart was reportedly the next big box store to move in beside the Kohl's. Mayor Anthony Krasienko told the the media he didn't think the developer had a signed tenant yet, and the city's building official said no permits had been sought for the site. A city staff member in the Engineering Department told the Morning Journal newspaper that the land work being done at the site was just to put in a permanent road. But one member of the City Council said she heard it directly from Liberty Development that they were considering a Wal-Mart. "There is no deal," a spokesman for the developer told the newspaper, and Wal-Mart told the Journal, they were unaware of any specific proposal, but added: "We're always looking for opportunities for growth and serving our customers." The land in question was slated to have a big box store, and the developer has been working with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to resolve some wetlands issues on the parcel. The lawyer for the project admitted that Wal-Mart has been interested in the site. "I know that Wal-Mart, as well as other retailers, have been looking in this area for quite some time, and I don't think anything has changed there," the Lighthouse Village lawyer noted. A city official made it clear that local officials were ready to say yes again to Wal-Mart. "We would entertain any company, big or small, coming into our community depending on how the deal is structured. As long as we create a win-win scenario for the business and the city of Lorain, I'm for it," said Lorain Service Director Robert Gilchrist. About a month and a half after denying they knew a Wal-Mart was knocking again, the Lorain City Council voted September 15th to approve a 200,000 s.f. superstore. They insisted that Wal-Mart build a "natural hedge" to buffer the residential properties behind the Lighthouse Village. Councilman Bret Schuster was the only one to vote against the plan. He raised concerns over the superstore's impact on other city businesses. "Wal-Mart is not the best fit there," he said. "It'll probably cause Super K to close its doors, and who knows what other businesses will be affected?"

What you can do: Wal-Mart convinced local officials in Lorain that the superstore will create as many as 400 jobs when it opens in 2010. That's before subtracting ouit jobs that will be lost elsewhere in the community. Mayor Tony Krasienko tried to allay residential concerns about the proximity of this huge store to nearby surrounding residents, along with their concerns over parking and lighting. One resident told the Chronicle-Telegram newspaper that he was "concerned about the height of the hedge and whether it'll be planted and growing before building begins." In 2005, Lorain voters overturned the City Council's vote to redistrict 37 acres along Cooper Foster Park Road for a 150,000 s.f. Wal-Mart store. The City Council approved the proposal in April of 2005. When the voters rejected the rezoning, Wal-Mart said at the time, "We thought with the approval of the rezone, we'd be able to serve the people of Lorain better. We're looking forward to serving them in our existing and future stores." Three years later, Wal-Mart finally got its way. The owner of this land must be turning over in her grave. She left the property to the local YWCA, who sold it to a Church, and the Church cashed out big time. Readers are urged to send an email to Lorain Mayor Tony Krasienko at the Mayor's Action Center: http://www.cityoflorain.org/mayor/action_center.shtml with this messsage: "Dear Mayor Krasienko, the Lighthouse Village is turning into Lighthouse Sprawl! You already have several big box stores there, and now a Wal-Mart supercenter. Voters made it clear in 2005 that they did not favor big box land development. There are already six Wal-Mart stores within 20 miles of Lorain, including the Elyria store on Midway Boulevard just five miles away. Your constituents have already been subjected to a Home Depot and a Kohl's at the 'Village.' Building a Wal-Mart will create neither new jobs nor taxes, because most of Wal-Mart's sales will come from existing merchants, especially your area grocery stores. This land, which traces back to a gift to the YMCA, was never meant for big boxes. You cannot seriously believe that a 'natural hedge' can buffer the neighbors from Wal-Mart. Even a sound wall can't do that. You -- and the neighbors -- will learn the hard way that neither a wall, nor a berm, nor a hedge, can cut off the noise, the lights, and the loss of residential property values that a Wal-Mart supercenter will bring. You will spend years in battles with the neighbors over this decision. You would do better now to work with Wal-Mart's architects to move the building as far away from houses as possible -- and get an independent noise consultant to work to protect the neighbors from this unpleasant new neighbor. Then talk with your assessors about giving these homes a sizeable property tax abatement for the harm you have done to their property."










 
 
"Norman has become the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement" ~ 60 Minutes

info@sprawl-busters.com
Strategic Planning ~ Field Operations
Voter Campaigns 
21 Grinnell St, Greenfield ~ MA 01301
(413) 772-6289