Sprawl-Busters Newsflash Blog - Anti-Sprawl news since 1998.
Subscribe to Sprawl-Busters Blog Follow Sprawl Busters on Twitter
Occupy Walmart & Order Al's Books Movies Newsflash! The Case Against Sprawl Home Towns Not Home Depot Victories Your Battles About Us Contact Us  

recent news

List articles
by the month:

2018
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2017
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2016
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2015
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2014
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2013
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2012
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2011
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2010
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2009
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2008
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2007
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2006
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2005
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2004
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2003
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2002
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2001
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2000
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

1999
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

1998
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC


Search database by text:

2009-07-01
Chicago, IL. Chicago Alderman Still Hungers For Wal-Jobs

What do Michael Bloomberg, Donald Trump, and Howard Brookins have in common? They all don't understand how Wal-Math works. The New York City Mayor, the entrepreneur, and the Chicago Alderman all think that Wal-Mart means new jobs. But according to "Wal-Math," one job created at Wal-Mart, minus one job destroyed at another retailer, equals one job. On April 26, 2009, Sprawl-Busters reported that Wal-Mart was still trying to use the jobs argument to open a second store in Chicago, Illinois. But the company has been facing a strong political wind of opposition in the Windy City. The retailer's attempts to open superstores in Chicago has resulted in one open facility, and five years of spinning wheels. Wal-Mart and big city Mayors generally don't get along. But Wal-Mart figures that as the economy slides downward, and more people lose their jobs, "Wal-jobs" will start to look better, and more cities will open up their doors to the discounter. Boston Mayor Tom Menino wouldn't let Wal-Mart into the Downtown Crossing area. Wal-Mart's forays into Brooklyn, New York have been very bloody. But last June, speaking at an analysts meeting, former Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott said that New York's Mayor Michael Bloomberg wanted a Wal-Mart. "I just talked to the Mayor," Scott said, "who wants us. And Donald Trump called this week. And he'd like to have us. But in general, New York City hasn't called and said please put a store there. Things get bad enough, they will." This waiting for things to get "bad enough" is the core strategy in Chicago. On February 6, 2009, Sprawl-Busters reported that Wal-Mart wanted to increase its one-store presence in Chicago. In May of 2008, Wal-Mart decided to abandon efforts to locate a store on the South Side of Chicago. The corporation said it was "turning its attention to a backup plan of opening stores just outside city limits." Chicago Mayor Richard Daley had reportedly advised Wal-Mart that he didn't want controversial headlines about big box battles in his city while his Administration pursues an effort to host the 2016 Olympics in Chicago. That decision won't be made by the Olympic Committee until this October. If true, that put a strangle hold on any Wal-Mart projects in the short-term. In March of 2008, city officials denied Wal-Mart's request to build a 150,000 s.f. store in the huge Chatham Market project, which spreads out over 50 acres on the site of a former steel plant, with a total of 418,000 s.f. of retail space. Chicago's Planning Commissioner notified Archon, an Irving, Texas-based developer that Wal-Mart would not be allowed to open at Chatham Market as proposed. Despite this history, rumors about Wal-Mart's renewed interest in Chicago began surfacing again in February of 2009. After losing its battle at the Chatham site, Archon, which is owned by the Goldman Sachs Group, put Wal-Mart's piece of the southside property up for sale, hunting for a new, and less-controversial anchor. In Chicago, the issue was not over zoning, but over wages. The Chicago City Council passed a "living wage" ordinance, but on September 19, 2006, Mayor Daley vetoed the legislation, which would have forced large corporations to pay a "living wage" to its workers. The City Council voted 31-to-18 to override his veto, coming just 3 votes short of the necessary two-thirds needed to override. The ordinance would have set minimum pay and benefit levels for any major retailer with a store 90,000 s.f. or larger. Wal-Mart issued a press release just after the vote which said: "We will open our first store in the city on Chicago's west side later this month. This store will show what a great asset Wal-Mart can be to the community, as an employer and corporate citizen, and as an affordable resource for thousands of Chicago's working families." It never worked out that way. Wal-Mart had hoped to open 20 stores in the city. Thus far they have opened only one 142,000 s.f. discount store on the west side of the city -- and only after a very contentious political debate. But Wal-Mart never gave up on its south side dreams. In February, 2009, the Chicago media ran stories that said Wal-Mart was preparing a 'new push' for as many as 5 new stores in Chicago. Chicago Alderman Howard Brookins, who has long supported a Wal-Mart in his ward, said the retailer wants to build its next store in his district, the 21st Ward on Chicago's South Side. Two other potential stores would also be located in the 20th and 34th wards, which are also on the South Side. But on March 4, 2009, Sprawl-Busters noted that most Chicago Aldermen remained opposed to Wal-Mart. Mayor Daley asked Brookins to hold off on pushing a new store. Crain's quoted one Alderman as saying Wal-Mart "would be welcome to come to Chicago if they gave their workers the right, if they so desire, to organize. We are simply asking them for that level of fairness." Alderman Brookins has drafted legislation that would take away power to approve the store from the city's Community Development Commission, and give that right to the City Council, but the Mayor has told Brookins he needs to have enough votes to overcome a Mayoral veto -- which Brookins is not likely to have. That's because over time, at least half a dozen of the Aldermen who supported Wal-Mart in 2006 have lost their seats. But Wal-Mart continues to push its voodoo economics claim that big box retail stores will help the city financially by generating sales taxes. Unfortunately, what the company fails to reveal is that most of that sales tax comes from replacing existing merchants who are generating that same sales tax now -- and paying their people a better wage. "We are evaluating all projects on a case-by-case basis," Wal-Mart said in written statement, "and balancing the city's current political and economic climate as we work to bring new locations to our Chicagoland customers." On April 26, 2009, the Chicago Tribune repeated Mayor Daley's opinion that there is 'no chance' that a south side Wal-Mart will happen. Daley told reporters there just were not enough votes on the City Council to pass a redevelopment agreement. Daley said Wal-Mart would bring taxes and jobs to Chicago, but one of the Mayor's key floor leaders on the City Council told the Tribune that the Mayor is trying to keep peace with the unions. "This is not gonna fly. You know that. They don't have enough votes," Daley concluded. Yesterday, Alderman Brookins was stumping again for Wal-Mart. The Tribune reports that the "Alderman From Wal-Mart" held his own press conference in front of City Hall urging his colleagues to allow a second Wal-Mart store into Chicago. "We need jobs, plain and simple," the Alderman said. Brookins has submitted an amendment to the Rules Committee that would make it easiser for the retailer to set up shop. But his amendment has been deferred. Brookins told the Tribune he is on the verge of having the 26 votes he needs to pass his amendment. To put more wind behind Brookins' effort, the Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce released a poll of 11 wards, which found that residents are "overwhelmingly" in favor of Wal-Mart opening a second store. The Chamber would not make it survey public, or reveal the push/pull of the questions. The Wal-Mart affair could blow open after October 2, 2009, when Chicago finds out it it has been picked to host the 2016 elections. If Chicago is not chosen, and falls out of the Olympic race, Mayor Daley may be more comfortable running after a Wal-Mart controversy, and fighting for Wal-Jobs for his constituents.

What you can do: If Mayor Daley wants to make peace with organized labor, his comments about Wal-Mart are likely to have the opposite effect. "You get revenue off of that," Daley told reporters last April. "You create jobs. They hire people from the community during construction and after. ... But, it's a political issue and they just don't have enough votes." Daley criticized labor as only trying to block Wal-Mart in Chicago, while allowing the retailer to build stores in a ring around Chicago. There are currently 19 Wal-Marts within 25 miles of Chicago, but inner city residents are not likely to be driving twenty miles into the suburbs to find cheap underwear. There have been anti-Wal-Mart battles in places like Tinley Park, Illinois, 23 miles from Chicago, and many other small town battles in Illinois, like East and West Dundee, Rockford, Godfrey, St.Charles, etc. "You can build Wal-Marts all over Cook County," Mayor Daley complained. "You can build 'em every day and no one says anything. They're building one of the largest Wal-Marts in Cicero and not one person will call the mayor, call the aldermen or say anything. It's a very political issue. Labor says no Wal-Marts should be built in Chicago, but everyplace else is alright. Everyplace in Illinois, except Chicago. ... That's the thing I don't understand." The head of the Service Employee's International Union told the Sun Times, "We're not opposed to Wal-Mart coming to Chicago if they'll be good corporate citizens. ... That means if you take tax dollars or TIF [tax-increment-financing] dollars, you have an obligation to the community in how you conduct your business." Meanwhile, this fragile peace with the unions may only last until October, when the International Olympic Committee makes its decision on where the Games will be held. In April of 2006, Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott, said that Wal-Mart "has never been afraid to invest in communities that are overlooked by other retailers." "We are a store that wants to come in and invest in that community," a Wal-Mart public affairs spokesperson told The Chicago Tribune in the spring of 2008. Readers are urged to email Alderman Howard Brookins at: info@aldermanhowardbrookinsjr.com with the following message: "Dear Alderman Brookins, I think you've got the right vision for the 21st ward -- but the wrong company. You correctly say that the goal should be 'new development [and] the creation of employment opportunities.' But Wal-Mart is not a source of new jobs -- plain and simple. A Wal-Mart on the South Side -- or any side -- of Chicago does not create "new" jobs. It represents old jobs transferred from other merchants. It's just shifting market share, and most of the sales will come from existing merchants in your ward. I know you have talked to many businessmen in your ward. They will tell you off the record that inviting Wal-Mart to the South Side is like inviting the cannibals to dinner. This is the company that had to vigorously deny reports that it was counseling its workers to vote against Barack Obama. This is the company that recently had to settle hundreds of wage and hour lawsuits brought by its own workers. Is this 'new' development and employment opportunity? How symbolic is it that Wal-Mart wanted to build at the Chatham Market, the site of an old steel plant? Wal-Mart adds no economic value to Chicago -- because they make nothing -- and what they sell others already carry. This is not the proud vision of a workforce in the 21st ward laboring at good wages, with good benefits. I urge you to focus on added value, on developing community-based economic development, and not chasing after national chain stores. The 21st ward does not need this kind of 'new development.'"










 
 
"Norman has become the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement" ~ 60 Minutes

info@sprawl-busters.com
Strategic Planning ~ Field Operations
Voter Campaigns 
21 Grinnell St, Greenfield ~ MA 01301
(413) 772-6289