Sprawl-Busters Newsflash Blog - Anti-Sprawl news since 1998.
Subscribe to Sprawl-Busters Blog Follow Sprawl Busters on Twitter
Occupy Walmart & Order Al's Books Movies Newsflash! The Case Against Sprawl Home Towns Not Home Depot Victories Your Battles About Us Contact Us  

recent news

List articles
by the month:

2018
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2017
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2016
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2015
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2014
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2013
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2012
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2011
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2010
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2009
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2008
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2007
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2006
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2005
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2004
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2003
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2002
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2001
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

2000
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

1999
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC

1998
JAN FEB MAR
APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP
OCT NOV DEC


Search database by text:

2010-04-22
Galt, CA. Wal-Mart Squeaks By With One Vote

The vote of just one person is going to fill more than 11 acres of land with a sea of asphalt surrounded by a wall of concrete.

This week, the Galt City Council made one of the biggest land use mistakes in its history, in front of one of the biggest crowds in history. But the deal does not end with the City Council vote.

By a split vote of 3-2, Galt City Councilors have given Wal-Mart a green light to build a 133,279 s.f. superstore in their community. Stores larger than 140,000 s.f. are banned in Galt, so this project pushes up to the limit.

As in most cities, local officials in Galt believe a new Wal-Mart means jobs and revenue -- but they voted with no clear understanding of the net economic impact that happens when Wal-Mart comes to town. In Galt, a new Wal-Mart will likely result is just a shifting of market share from existing merchants to the giant retailer.

On September 18, 2007, Sprawl-Busters reported that the City Council in Galt was reviewing a proposed zoning ordinance that would ban any retail stores larger than 140,000 s.f., if it had more than 10% of its interior retail space devoted to non-taxable goods, like groceries.

The law in Galt also requires stores between 100,000 to 139,999 s.f. to apply for a conditional use permit. Developers also have to produce impact studies on the project's effect on crime, urban decay, the economy and the project's general compatibility within a neighborhood.

In late September of 2007, the city's Planning Commission approved by a vote of 4-1 the big box ordinance, which officials said would apply to the proposed Wal-Mart supercenter in Galt. The commission lowered the size limit for certain stores to 120,000 s.f. that devote 10% of their floor space to selling groceries, or non-taxable goods. The Lodi News said the supercenter has 19% of grocery space, but usually a supercenter has 35% to 45% grocery space.

On their way out of the Planning Commission in 2007, a Wal-Mart spokesman told the News, "We weren't expecting this outcome today. Our current application would be out of compliance with this ordinance. The recommendation would prevent us from building a store identical to the ones we have in Elk Grove and Lodi. We are looking forward to the City Council further reviewing and listening to the public comment. We will have to regroup with our team."

Planning Commissioner Eugene Davenport told the newspaper two years ago that he didn't trust companies like Wal-Mart. "It's unacceptable that we are letting these corporations come in and tell us what they are going to do," he said. "It is our job to protect the citizens of Galt with smart planning."

Within weeks after the Planning Commission vote, the Galt City Council voted 4-1 to adopt the big box ordinance. But Wal-Mart was not deterred. Two and a half years later, Wal-Mart was back before the Galt Planning Commission. So were the plan's opponents, the Galt Citizens for Sensible Planning.

The Planning Commission had to review Wal-Mart's Conditional Use Permit, Final Environmental Impact Report, Compliance with the Big Box Ordinance, and appeal of the Community Development Director's Notice of Decision on Site Plan and Design Review.

The city's Planning staff bent Galt's General Plan to fit Wal-Mart's plan. Incredibly, planning staff concluded that "The proposed project would expand and provide new retail options in close proximity to local consumers by providing daytime and nighttime shopping opportunities." Staff also concluded that Galt is "underserved by retail options" despite the easy access to other Wal-Mart stores in the area. This project is also only 60 feet from the patios of nearest residential homes. A 12 foot sound wall has to be built to buffer nearby homes from the noise of this project.

In Galt, projects also have to show a positive fiscal balance for the city, and staff concluded that Wal-Mart would generate $497,624 annually in revenues from property and sales taxes, and cost only $37,890 in city costs. Staff says the project will create another "$230,000 per year in sales tax revenue that is ear marked for police services only." But the city failed to examine the fiscal impacts of other stores closing, and falling sales tax revenues.

The city's General Plan also says that "smart growth principles... shall be incorporated into development project proposals." Staff could not find any smart growth principles, so instead praised the project's use of "ozone friendly refrigerants" and "energy-efficient HVAC units."

Finally, developments in Galt are supposed to be "compatible with neighboring uses." The planning staff found that "impacts related to cumulative traffic and cumulative
aesthetics would remain significant and unavoidable." In other words, neighbors will just have to live with those negative impacts.

On March 28, 2010, Sprawl-Busters reported that a crowd of 200 people showed up for the Wal-Mart hearing. The Planning Commission voted 4-1 to approve the 133,279 s.f. Wal-Mart proposal. But the Planning Commission's vote led to an appeal by opponents to the Galt City Council. In a small concession to the neighbors, the Planning Commission voted to cut back the operating hours for the store to 6 a.m. to 11 p.m.

Residents repeated their position that they wanted a store no bigger than 100,000 s.f., which was supported by one Commissioner. "I'm not going to approve this at 130,000 square feet. There is no city infrastructure to support it," the Commissioner said.

But on April 20, 2010, the Galt City Council -- by one vote -- approved the Wal-Mart superstore. There were so many people at the hearing it had to be moved to a larger venue. The store will include 25,000 s.f. for the sale of groceries. The City Council also rejected the neighbor's request that the store have reduced operating hours. The Council will allow the store to open at 5 AM, and close at midnight. Wal-Mart argued that the longer hours will allow workers to stock shelves, clean and cook.

But this project is heading towards a courtroom, not a ribbon-cutting. The Sacramento Business Journal reports that one day after the City Council ruling, the Galt Citizens for Sensible Planning (GCSP) was likely to appeal the decision in court. Attorney William Kopper,of Davis,California, who is representing GCSP, told the Journal that there was a "good possibility" that the group would appeal. Kopper said the project violates the city's municipal code and California's Environmental Quality Review Act.

After the vote, a Wal-Mart spokeswoman said she was "pleased" with the vote. "The community wants and needs the benefits the store would provide," she said. Wal-Mart said their store would help keep sales tax dollars local, and allow residents to shop closer. But a spokesman for GCSP, Rich Viera told the Lodi News, "It is idiotic. The only justification is sales tax money."



What you can do: Galt's retail area is perhaps best known for the Galt Market, which began as a farmer's market at the old Sacramento County Fairgrounds in the 1950's, and today is an expansive open-air collection of over 400 vendors covering ten acres of great deals.

As the city says, "the Galt Market is an inviting place to spend a relaxed day, looking for bargains, having some good food and taking home fresh produce for dinner. There is truly nothing like it anywhere else, as it's over three quarters of a million annual customers can testify." In this context, a suburban sprawl Wal-Mart makes no sense at all. It is incompatible with the 'nothing like its anywhere else' character of Galt.

This case now moves to the courts. In terms of impact on other stores, the city's planning staff report found that "At worst, $6.5 million in food store sales will be diverted away from existing primary market area retailers... the Project would not result in adverse impacts to retailers because although some stores would experience reduced sales in the short-term, these stores are expected to achieve stabilized sales within three years." But this is just wishful thinking. An independent assessment of this store's impact has not been done.

Readers are urged to email Galt Mayor Randy Shelton at rshelton@ci.galt.ca.us with the following message: "Dear Mayor Shelton, Good land use decisions never end up in a win/lose situation. Your Wal-Mart vote this week forces neighbors to lose big-time. This project is far too close to homes, and far too large for the neighborhood. Yet you sacrificed their quality of life and the value of their homes just to build another superstore in the area.

You told voters, "We need to... bring responsible Smart Growth" to Galt. Your residents have lots of places to find big box stores nearby -- but there is only one Galt Market. This store will harm locally-serving retail uses. One independent study of Wal-Mart has concluded that for every one Wal-Mart superstore that opens, two grocery stores will close.

Before you start counting your future revenues from this project, remember that it's the net revenues you need to calculate -- not the gross revenue. Wal-Mart moves money from existing cash registers to its own stores. That is economic displacement, not economic development.

This project is inconsistent with your General Plan in many ways. Your decision will now lead to a courtroom. I urge you not to spend one dime of city money on legal fees. Let Wal-Mart pay for defending its permit. You clearly have a lot of voters upset about this project. Don't force them to use their tax dollars to defend Wal-Mart. The wealthy retailer has more than enough money to pay for its own legal defense."













 
 
"Norman has become the guru of the anti-Wal-Mart movement" ~ 60 Minutes

info@sprawl-busters.com
Strategic Planning ~ Field Operations
Voter Campaigns 
21 Grinnell St, Greenfield ~ MA 01301
(413) 772-6289