South Euclid, OH Wal-Mart Crawls Out Of The Woodwork
On May 15, 2011, Sprawl-Busters reported from South Euclid, Ohio, that residents were actively organizing to fight off a proposed Wal-Mart superstore. A development company called First Interstate Properties had purchased part of the Oakwood Country Club property in South Euclid, Ohio, with the intent of using part of the land for big box retail.
Owner Mitchell Schneider had purchased 62 acres in South Euclid, and was closing in on another 92 acres in Cleveland Heights. Schneider described his plans as 63 acres for retail, 22 acres for residential, and the rest open space. Schneider indicated at the time that like his other malls, he'd like to attract stores like Target, Home Depot or Wal-Mart.
There are currently 6 Wal-Mart stores within 15 miles of South Euclid/Cleveland Heights area, including one Wal-Mart right in Cleveland Heights on Mayfield Road, and a superstore 8 miles away in Bedford. The entire shopping center footprint under consideration would be around 325,000 s.f., or around the size of 5.5 football fields -- plus the parking area.
The land First Interstate chose was zoned residential, not commercial -- so opponents began to organize around that vulnerable issue. A group called Citizens for Oakwood, which is part of a larger non-profit group called the Severance Neighborhood Organization (SNO), began organizing for a bitter fight. "The future of the neighborhood is in your hands" the group said in a postcard mailing, which showed a photo of the Country Club with a bulldozer threatening it. "Is This What You Want?"
This battle was a déjà vu for Cleveland Heights residents, who in 1994, beat back a similar big box proposal submitted by Developer's Diversified Realtors. This time, opponents of the Schneider plan said that if the Oakwood project were built, the existing Wal-Mart discount store in Cleveland Heights just one mile away would be closed.
South Euclid city government was so anxious to land this project that the city updated its Comprehensive Plan, admitting it was "precipitated by a request to rezone a 41-acre portion of the Oakwood Site from residential to commercial use." Opponents decided that it the City Council voted to rezone the property, they would take the issue to South Euclid voters on the ballot. "Oakwood is not a done deal," they said. "This is our community."
The local media scoffed at claims that Wal-Mart was the likely anchor store for the project. The Sun News wrote in an editorial: "We strongly urge Schneider not to try and lure Wal-Mart from [Cleveland Heights] -- there are plenty of other national retailers that are underserved in this area to fill the shopping center."But First Interstate would never confirm that it had a deal with Wal-Mart, and the giant retailer, as usual, would not confirm its interest in the project either.
On November 8, 2011, Question 96 on South Euclid Rezoning came before the voters. A total of 7,723 votes were cast, with 4,272 (55%) in favor of the rezoning, and 3,451 (45%) against the big box rezoning. The developer reportedly poured as much as half a million dollars into the referendum, which is roughly $117 per vote. After the election, South Euclid City Council President David Miller, who was re-elected, and who strongly supported the Oakwood Commons project, made this remark to big box opponents: "Thank you and goodbye. Crawl back under the rock you came from."
Within three months of the election, word began to filter out that Wal-Mart was, in fact, the mysterious 180,000 s.f. anchor tenant in the Oakwoods Commons project. An actual rendering of the Wal-Mart footprint was posted by a real estate company on its website, and was reposted on the Heights Observer Blog in late February. The real estate company quickly pulled the brochure down -- but it was too late, the Wal-Mart was out of the bag.
The Cleveland Plain Dealer promptly ran a story that local residents were "dismayed" that a Wal-Mart would sit on property that once was a golf course. "A Wal-Mart Supercenter will destroy local business and cannibalize from our local grocers, who pay a living wage, unlike Wal-Mart," one opponent said. "In an area like ours, with declining population and income, new retail only survives by taking from existing stores."
A Wal-Mart spokesman finally admitted to the Plain Dealer, "Our customers have told us that they want more convenient access to affordable groceries, and we think a new store at Oakwood Commons can be a part of the solution for local families. We hope to have more details to share soon." Mitchell Schneider, the owner of the property, refused however to nail it down as a Wal-Mart. "What I can confirm to you is that we are in fact still in negotiation with Wal-Mart (and others) and if and when we have a final, formal agreement, I will definitely provide you with an announcement."
The ugly reality is that a new Wal-Mart at Oakwood means the Wal-Mart less than 1 mile away at Severance Town Center in Cleveland Heights will shut down. The economic development director for Cleveland Heights did not mince his words. He told the Plain Dealer that his office had been working hard to keep the Severance Wal-Mart alive. "It makes my stomach turn to think that after this whole rejuvenation of collaboration and communities working together, that we're going to have one big box store move five blocks away to another community," he said.
For Wal-Mart, such hop-scotch development is standard practice. Usually the company tells local communities that a larger store will create hundreds of new jobs -- but in South Euclid, Wal-Mart admitted that because it will be shutting down an existing store nearby, the net job change would only be 85 jobs. If any of the existing grocery stores near Oakwood Commons shut down, the net job impact could very well be negative. First Interstate Properties continues to boast that the South Euclid project will create 700 jobs.
What you can do: Ironically, in late January, the city of South Euclid became the 18th community in Cuyahoga County to approve an 'anti-poaching' agreement. Under this agreement, individual communities agree not to actively pursue or encourage re-location of businesses now located in other Cuyahoga communities. The agreement also calls on cities and towns to notify one another if they learn of a company planning to relocate.
This kind of anti-pilfering agreement -- had it been in place before the Oakwood Commons project -- would have made it much more difficult for the South Euclid City Council to steal Cleveland Heights' Wal-Mart store.
But the anti-poaching compact -- which is a good land use tool -- is too little, too late for Cleveland Heights, and for the residents of South Euclid who are located only minutes away from an existing Wal-Mart store at the Severance Town Center. Many homeowners will suffer a loss in property value, and suffer through traffic congestion, just to line the pockets of a large developer who ignores zoning maps, and a huge retailer which changes retail locations as casually as you or I change shoes.
The South Euclid referendum demonstrates once again that any town's future is for sale to the highest bidder. When votes can be purchased with unbridled corporate spending, the whole concept of orderly zoning is out the window. Another example of the high cost of corporate free speech.
Readers are urged to email South Euclid Mayor Georgine Welo at: firstname.lastname@example.org with the following message:
"Dear Mayor Welo,
Your city bent over backwards to steal revenues from Cleveland Heights as part of the Oakwood Commons project -- and now you agree to a County Plan that will not allow other towns to poach your Wal-Mart like you did to them.
The sad fact is, your city demonstrated that it was incapable of thinking about regional impacts at all -- but only what goes on inside your borders. South Euclid is not an island, and your support for building another big box store less than a mile from an existing store is proof that regional planning is dead in South Euclid.
On top of that, your City Council President, in the flush of his re-election, tells voters in the region, "Crawl back under the rock you came from!" To which city voters might have been justified in responding with: "Crawl back under the Wal-Mart you came from!"
The Cleveland Heights store will close, and one of the last major pieces of open space in your community will be lost. North East Ohio is already saturated with Wal-Marts, including a superstore only 8 miles away in Bedford. In return, you have Wal-Mart's promise of 85 new jobs -- not counting those lost at other existing grocery stores.
This First Interstate fiasco brings no added value economically to your city. Retail must follow growth, not lead it. Inviting Wal-Mart to South Euclid is like inviting the cannibals to dinner, and it is your existing merchants who are the main course on the menu. Your Administration has made the basic mistake of believing that a new building going up means jobs -- while the buildings and the merchants going down as a result don't count.
For your constituents, economic development has turned into economic dislocation. And your neighbors now know that you are willing to steal from them to pad your resume as Mayor."