Hawthorne, NJ. Wal-Mart Scrubs Plans For Neighborhood Market
On June 27, 2012, Sprawl-Busters reported that residents in Hawthorne, New Jersey had taken legal action to block a proposed Wal-Mart grocery store. Roughly 10 months later, Wal-Mart has pulled the plug on its own project.
Hawthorne residents Scott Mitchell, William Botto and the group "Hawthorne Deserves Better Inc.", which has more than 400 members, filed a lawsuit in Superior Court to block approval given by the Hawthorne Planning Board in December of 2011. Some ShopRite employees were also involved in the lawsuit. Local officials consented to a 42,000 s.f. supermarket plus 10,000 s.f. additional retail space as proposed by the developer, 204 Wagaraw Road LLC.
Hawthorne Deserves Better stated their case on a website: "We are dedicated to the idea that the Wal-Mart Supermarket coming to Hawthorne, NJ is a poor fit for our community. We value small business, and Wal-Mart hurts small business. We value hard work, we feel that Wal-Mart does not treat its workers as well as they should. We value our safety, we feel a 24 hour Wal-Mart will increase crime and burden our police officers. We value our homes, we believe the Wal-Mart brand will lower our property values and the viability of our downtown business district. We believe Hawthorne deserves better than Wal-Mart."
Hawthorne is a borough of roughly 18,000 people. For months, Hawthorne Deserves Better Inc. planted lawn signs around the community, and gathered more than 1,000 names against the project on a petition. Wal-Mart had not publicly acknowleged that it would lease the space during any of the borough hearings.
According to the citizens' group, the land in question is known as the old Merck site, once home to an industrial plant owned by the drug manufacturer, Merck & Co. The land has been empty for roughly 9 years. Over the years a number of projects have been proposed for the site, including a train station, townhouses, a Kohls department store and a Home Depot.
The current developer picked up the property in 2008, was negotiating a contract with Kohl's department store, but the widening recession killed the deal. It was not until the spring of 2011 that rumors of a grocery store were confirmed. The developer would not reveal who the tenant was, cited a confidentiality agreement.
In the fall of 2011, the Hawthorne Planning Board changed the borough's zoning code to allow grocery stores, drugstores and restaurants to remain open all night, instead of having to shut down at 11 pm, and open at 6 am. This change was made to accommodate the developer, who said the retail tenant interested in the Merck site needed to conduct 24 hour operations. The borough council also voted to endorse the zoning change, and just before Christmas of 2011, the supermarket proposal was also approved by the council .
One month later, Passaic County's Planning Board ratified the supermarket plans, with no retail tenant named. One board member objected to the plan, citing the potential impact of the project on an already congested county roadway. In February of 2012, the project was back before the Hawthorne planning board for final passage, and local residents spoke out against the plan once again.
Hawthorne Mayor Richard Goldberg let the retailer out of the bag at that meeting, admitting that it was a Wal-Mart Neighborhood Market. Hizzoner was quoted as saying at the time, "Can I tell you I'm thrilled it's a Wal-Mart? No, I'm not thrilled it's a Wal-Mart." The Council ultimately approved the 24/7 Wal-Mart project.
This week, according to northjersey.com, Wal-Mart announced that it had made "a business decision not to move forward with plans to open a neighborhood market in Hawthorne. We wish the municipality and developer well as they move forward. We will continue to evaluate opportunities in northern New Jersey to create jobs and expand access to affordable groceries."
In additional to the Neighborhood Market, plans called for four other tenants, or 51,180 square feet on the 8.67 acres site. The land is now owend by the Bedrin Organization, the parent company of 204 Wagaraw Road, LLC.
The citizen's lawsuit challenged two ordinances, which proposed changing conditional-use requirements for shopping centers in the I-1 zone. It plaintiffs say the ordinances made no findings concerning whether they are substantially consistent with Hawthorne's master plan.
"Hundreds of Hawthorne residents stood together and said no, we won't settle. We deserve better," the President of Hawthorne Deserves Better, Joe Osborne, told northjersey.com."Now the work begins to bring smart development to Wagaraw Road that will raise our property values rather than hurt them, that will preserve the safe and small town community that we love, and that will benefit our small businesses rather than eliminate them. This is proof that ordinary citizens can make a difference, even when fighting an opponent as intimidating as Wal-Mart. I love this town and I thank everyone who worked so hard for this amazing result."
What you can do: According to Hawthorne Deserves Better, the lawsuit filed by residents "addresses a wide range of actions involving the proposal including conditional use variances granted to the developers by the planning board, the design of the site plan and the alleged failure to give adequate public notice with the proper list of variances or waivers to the residents.
"If not for our efforts," the group says, "we would still not know it was Wal-Mart coming to Hawthorne. They know that communities react with disapproval to Wal-Mart locating in their town, so they keep the Wal-Mart name off the project as long as possible... We need to help our elected officials understand that the community they serve does not want a Wal-Mart here so they can find a solution."
Readers are urged to email Hawthorne Borough Mayor Richard Goldberg at email@example.com with the following message:
"Dear Mayor Goldberg,
It may be too soon for you to appreciate this fact: but your borough has just dodged a bullet!
Fortunately, Hawthorne will get better than Wal-Mart. Using the old Merck site for a retail grocery store clearly will never produce the economic benefits to the borough that a manufacturing plant could do. The borough should never have 'down-zoned' the property for retail use. An industrial site should never be converted to retail -- the pay off is just not there.
In this case, Wal-Mart already has 7 stores within 15 miles of Hawthorne, so local residents do not have to travel far to get their fix of cheap, Chinese imports. You have a Wal-Mart less than six miles away in Saddle Brook, so this is not about being a 'food desert.'
The Wal-Mart grocery was not a form of economic development, because Wal-Mart thrives by taking market share away from existing merchants. No new jobs would have come from this store, and the Council should never have granted 24 hour operations that disrupt the lives of people who live near the site. Wal-Mart has plenty of stores that are not open around the clock.
You have many residents who spoke out against this plan. They were right to use their First Amendment rights to file a lawsuit to stop this wasteful, unproductive development. Now its time to get busy and work with Hawthorne Deserves Better to come up with that better plan.
You were right to say last year that you were not 'thrilled' with the Wal-Mart plan. But now you can say you are 'thrilled' they are gone."